Most construction professionals analyse delays. Very few know how courts actually decide them.This course changes that.As courts say "no analytical technique commands deference in itself."Courts decide delay claims through a legal framework — not through the sophistication of the delay analysis methodology.What the court weighs is whether the analysis faithfully captures actual causation and correctly applies the legal framework?This is not an AI voice over course with slides. Dipen actually delivers the course face-to face. Built entirely on judicial precedent from the TCC Courts In England this course gives you a structured, case-law backed legal framework to do what project managers, planners, and even many lawyers cannot — decide delay claims with the authority and reasoning of a court.You will learn how courts identify and characterise delay events, how they apportion liability in concurrent delay situations, and how they determine entitlement to Extension of Time (EOT), Liquidated Damages (LDs), and Prolongation Costs — step by step.This course is for you if you are:A construction lawyer or arbitration counsel handling delay disputesA quantity surveyor or contract manager who needs to build or defend claimsAn in-house counsel advising on live construction contractsA young lawyer entering construction or infrastructure practiceWhat makes this different from every other delay course on Udemy:No scheduling software. No Gantt chart tutorials. Only the legal reasoning, the leading cases, and a practical framework drawn directly from how courts decide.Enrol now and start deciding — not just analysing.Dipen Shah sh
What you'll learn
Understanding how courts identify and characterize delay events
Apportioning liability in concurrent delay situations
Determining entitlement to Extension of Time, Liquidated Damages, and Prolongation Costs
Course objectives
Equip construction professionals with the legal reasoning necessary to assess delay claims effectively
Provide practical frameworks based on real judicial cases